
But “the noon of the papacy was the midnight of the world.”—J. A. Wylie, The History of Protestantism, b. 1, ch. 4. The Holy Scriptures were almost unknown, not only to the people, but to the priests. Like the Pharisees of old, the papal leaders hated the light which would reveal their sins. God’s law, the standard of righteousness, having been removed, they exercised power without limit, and practiced vice without restraint. Fraud, avarice, and profligacy prevailed. Men shrank from no crime by which they could gain wealth or position. The palaces of popes and prelates were scenes of the vilest debauchery. Some of the reigning pontiffs were guilty of crimes so revolting that secular rulers endeavored to depose these dignitaries of the church as monsters too vile to be tolerated. For centuries Europe had made no progress in learning, arts, or civilization. A moral and intellectual paralysis had fallen upon Christendom. GC 60.2
Kim LaCapria
Sat, July 26, 2025 at 3:55 AM GMT+32 min read
Found Common Ground on one Major Issue!
Amid a summit characterized as “thorny” and “fraught” in Beijing, China and the European Union found common ground on one major issue, issuing a firm joint resolution on climate matters, the Los Angeles Times reported.
When the leading churches of the United States, uniting upon such points of doctrine as are held by them in common, shall influence the state to enforce their decrees and to sustain their institutions, then Protestant America will have formed an image of the Roman hierarchy, and the infliction of civil penalties upon dissenters will inevitably result….
The enforcement of Sundaykeeping on the part of Protestant churches is an enforcement of the worship of the papacy….
In the very act of enforcing a religious duty by secular power, the churches would themselves form an image to the beast; hence the enforcement of Sundaykeeping in the United States would be an enforcement of the worship of the beast and his image.—The Great Controversy, 445, 448, 449 (1911). LDE 131.1 – LDE 131.3
The Times described “an otherwise tense bilateral summit,” one “riven with major disagreements” over high-profile issues such as global trade and Russia’s war with Ukraine.
News sources around the world observed tension and discord at the summit Thursday — which makes the parties’ joint “press statement on climate” all the more striking.
ADVERTISEMENT

Fluid and Turbulent International Situation!
At the beginning of the statement, the parties concurred that “in the fluid and turbulent international situation today, it is crucial that all countries, notably the major economies, maintain policy continuity and stability and step up efforts to address climate change.”
A New York Times article about the statement identified China and the EU as two of the world’s three most prolific “polluters.”
“They didn’t mention the United States by name, but they didn’t have to,” the Times added.

Watch now: Does clean energy really cause blackouts?
China and the EU agreed to “demonstrate leadership together to drive a global just transition in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication,” listing seven action-oriented examples of their planned cooperation.


The statement was issued on the day of the summit, which also marked the 10th anniversary of the adoption of the Paris Agreement — a landmark, legally binding international treaty with a primary goal of keeping average temperatures “well below 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels.”

The agreement also established a framework for developed nations to “take the lead” on climate action, assisting developing nations and working together with a shared goal. In January, the United States pulled out of the Paris Agreement for a second time after withdrawing in 2017 and rejoining in 2021.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen told Chinese President Xi Jinping that the two parties were at a turning point, per the BBC, pointing to tension resulting from increased interaction between China and the EU.
Should the U.S. be investing more in battery production to catch up with China?
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
In her opening remarks, von der Leyen was direct when addressing China.
ADVERTISEMENT
“We have reached an inflection point. Rebalancing our bilateral relation is essential. Because to be sustainable, the relations need to be mutually beneficial,” she said.

At the summit’s conclusion, von der Leyen reiterated that the way in which China “continues to interact with [Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s war will be a determining factor [in their EU] relations going forward,” showing that the EU and China both walked away from the table with disagreements — ones they put aside to fight climate change.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don’t miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.






































